Skip to main content

Paramount+ Review and Breakdown

 


Paramount+, the rebranded CBS All Access streaming service from ViacomCBS, launched today. It got me thinking about this photograph. Are you familiar with it? 


If you aren't, perhaps you're wondering why Tom Cruise is standing next to Charlton Heston who is standing next to Penny Marshall who is standing to Bob Hope who is standing next to Victor Mature who is standing next to
*squints* Elizabeth McGovern who is standing next to Robert De Niro. The whole photo is full of weird combinations like that - Shelley Long next to Jimmy Stewart, Molly Ringwald next to Dorothy Lamour, Gregory Peck next to Debra Winger. This photograph was taken in celebration of Paramount's 75th anniversary in 1987. But you're forgiven if you didn't guess that, because who looks at all these people and thinks immediately that what they all have in common was working for Paramount at one point? Certainly not I. 

And therein lies the problem with Paramount+'s marketing strategy. Paramount, unlike Disney, does not have the kind of unified brand identity that you need to get people to automatically recognize it. Except Paramount+ isn't even using illustrious and glamorous movie stars to market the new service, but rather what they've cynically termed "brands".  You've probably seen the terrible ads - Gayle King hanging out with RuPaul, Dora the Explorer, and a Klingon. Huh? What does that tell us about what this streaming service is and how it is different from the others?

When I ranked all the streaming services a couple of months ago, I listed many problems CBS All Access needed to address if it wanted to compete with Netflix and HBO Max. It has not taken my advice. Paramount+ is just CBS All Access with a new (worse) name. There have been no changes, let alone improvements, to the interface. If there's additional library content, I haven't noticed it. It's the most disappointing launch for a new service because it's not a new service. 

I must ask: why rebrand now? I'd understand if they had some Mandalorian-level show that they could launch with. But they don't. (They do, however, have a new Spongebob movie and a reunion of the cast of the first season of The Real World, if you're young enough to enjoy the former or old enough to enjoy the latter). Last week, the execs behind the service announced a slew of shows in development, including a reboot of Frasier and a bunch of shows based on Paramount movies. They also announced that linear channels a la Pluto will be coming to the service at some point (Remember, after ViacomCBS bought Pluto, they put Pluto's Tom Ryan in charge of all their streamers). But why didn't they wait until they had these selling points to launch this rebranding? There is no reason anyone who wasn't interested in CBS All Access would be interested in Paramount+ as it is now.

You'd have difficulty locating movies with just about any of these golden age stars from the 75th anniversary photos. Paramount's classic film library isn't being utilized at all. Also, they don't even have all of the Star Trek movies! How can they market themselves as the streaming home for the Star Trek universe when Hulu has just as many Star Trek shows and movies? It speaks to ViacomCBS's larger strategy, which is to get money where it can by making licensing deals with other streamers. They sold the streaming rights to Yellowstone to rival Peacock, which is why you won't find that hit show on Paramount+. That's a fine strategy, but they can't do that and also want a highly competitive streamer of their own. Streaming services need exclusive content to be competitive, both original and library. The fact that ViacomCBS hasn't equipped Paramount+ with significant amounts of either is laughable. 

It's obvious that ViacomCBS isn't willing to write the kind of checks that Paramount+ would need to compete with Netflix in terms of producing new content. But why can't they spruce up the interface, or at least give us a watchlist? I mean, why even bother changing the name at all? They would have been better off focusing on growing the free, ad-supported Pluto and keeping CBS All Access' appeal niche. But, they went with Paramount+ instead. Let's see how this works out for them.

If you would like to see me talking some more about Paramount+, subscribe to my brand new YouTube channel!



Comments

  1. Your blog took to me an entirely significant spot. It is a beneficial and factual article to enhance knowledge. Thanks for sharing an article like this.dazn free trial

    ReplyDelete
  2. The further thrill comes from ready to|with the ability to|having the ability to} make neighbor bets you could modify to incorporate a lot as} 9 numbers on each side of your primary guess. 메리트카지노 Black & Yellow Roulette at PartyCasino a shot — you might not need to play roulette some other method after this. Pala Casino’s Roulette Advanced should be proper up your alley. You can place your bets instantly on the recent or cold numbers, and might also|you can even} make your commonplace neighbor bets. French Roulette from Harrah’s is another gorgeously laid out game, making the entire approach uncluttered and streamlined to provide the best consideration to} what’s taking place.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Leave a comment!

Popular posts from this blog

Who is The Black Hood on Riverdale? Here are 5 Possible Suspects

There's a killer on the loose in Riverdale , the setting of the CW's dark adaptation of the Archie Comics, now in its second season. He's called the Black Hood, a reference to the vigilante superhero comic book of the same name published by Archie Comics. So far, he has shot Fred Andrews (Luke Perry), murdered Ms. Grundy (Sarah Habel) with a cello bow, and shot at Midge and Moose ( Emilija Baranac and Cody Kearsley), all while wearing his executioner's hood-style hood, which is how he got his name. His letter to the Coopers in the third episode of the season reveals he is targeting victims that he sees as criminals or hypocrites and the fourth episode revealed he got the idea from Betty's (Lili Reinhart) speech from the end of last season, where she pleaded that "Riverdale must do better." It's looking like figuring out the Black Hood's identity will be the big mystery of season two, so I have put together a list of possible suspects. Note: Th...

A Great Show Rushes to its End: "Mom" Finale Review

It's never easy to end a TV show, especially a long-running, beloved show like Mom . "My Kinda People and the Big To-Do," the last episode of Mom that aired May 13 on CBS, was a good episode. It was maybe even a great episode. But was it a satisfying series conclusion? No, not really. But we're getting ahead of ourselves. Before we talk about what didn't happen in the episode, let's talk about what did happen.  The episode begins at an AA meeting, as many episodes have. The ladies - Bonnie, Tammy, Jill, Marjorie, & Wendy - all share. They're all happy and in good places in their lives, much to the annoyance of newcomer Shannon (played by Melanie Lynskey, independent film mainstay whose sitcom credits include Chuck Lorre's Two and a Half Men ). Bonnie wants to help Shannon, as she had been helped by others when she too was new to the program, and even chases Shannon in the rain when she leaves the meeting. Later in the episode, we see Shannon...

Ranking the Five Best On Screen Portrayals of Hercule Poirot

Before Kenneth Brnagh dons the iconic mustache in the highly-anticpated new adaptation of Murder on the Orient Express (in theatres November 10th), I thought I would take a look back at some of the most famous portryals of Hercule Poirot. Agatha Christie's signature creation, Poirot is peculiar. meticulous, and at times, bombastic and arrogant, but he always solves the case in the end, with the help of his little grey cells. Countless actors have portrayed the Belgian detective on stage, screen, or radio, including Charles Laughton, Austin Trevor, Orson Welles, and Ian Holm. But this list focuses on TV or film adaptations just becuase those are the ones I have seen. 5. Alfred Molina (2001) Molina played Poirot in the 2001 TV movie version of Murder on the Orient Express . He's a terrific actor, generally, but his Poirot is not distinctive or memorable in any way. The accent is not great, the mustache is not great, and he is not eccentric enough to get away with bei...